* Fix default sourceFileName.
This deals with a problem mentioned in [babel/babelify#255][0]. I'm not
super sure about the implications, but it seems this may have been a
regression from Babel 6.
In babel@6, the default `sourceFileName` was the basename of the input
file:
```js
require('babel-core').transform('var a = 10', {
filename: __filename,
sourceMaps: true
}).map
// { version: 3,
// sources: [ 'index.js' ],
// names: [ 'a' ],
// mappings: 'AAAA,IAAIA,IAAI,EAAR',
// file: 'index.js',
// sourcesContent: [ 'var a = 10' ] } }
```
Currently however, the full file path is used:
```js
require('@babel/core').transformSync('var a = 10', {
filename: __filename,
sourceMaps: true
}).map
// { version: 3,
// sources: [ '/home/goto-bus-stop/Code/babel/repro-babelify-255/index.js' ],
// names: [ 'a' ],
// mappings: 'AAAA,IAAIA,IAAI,EAAR',
// file: '/home/goto-bus-stop/Code/babel/repro-babelify-255/index.js',
// sourcesContent: [ 'var a = 10' ] } }
```
This patch adds the `path.basename()` call that [Babel 6 used][1] to
@babel/core's default options, so it's the same as back then.
```js
require('../babel/packages/babel-core').transform('var a = 10', {
filename: __filename,
sourceMaps: true
}).map
// { version: 3,
// sources: [ 'index.js' ],
// names: [ 'a' ],
// mappings: 'AAAA,IAAIA,IAAI,EAAR',
// sourcesContent: [ 'var a = 10' ] }
```
This is the desired behaviour for browserify at least, as it expects
relative paths in the source maps and rebases them to a root directory
when generating the final source map.
[0]: https://github.com/babel/babelify/pull/255
[1]: 6689d2d23c/packages/babel-core/src/transformation/file/index.js (L163-L172)
* Use cwd-relative path for sourceFileName.
* Revert sourceMap `file` property change.
* fixup! Revert sourceMap `file` property change.
* Fix whitespace change from merge conflict
* Revert to using basename in source map outputs.
We were using `Object.create` to setup the prototype chain at the start of the class definition, which lead to #7771.
I was a bit worried about a speed hit, but it seems everyone optimizes the two patterns the same way.
https://jsbench.github.io/#f9fca52407643d96458a35763b201215Fixes#7771.
* Update decorators parsing
This commit introduces three changes:
1) Class properties can be decorated
2) Decorators can contain arbitrary expressions, using @(...)
3) The Decorator node type has a new property, "arguments". This
makes it possible do distinguish @dec() and @(dec()), which have
different behaviors because @(dec()) is equivalent to @(dec())().
* Rename Decorator#expression to Decorator#callee
* Add test for @dec()()
* #7349
- Add "use strict" directive to transformed class bodies
* Update tests (#7349)
* Add test for program with use strict directive (#7349)
* Update tests (#7349)
* Update source mapping (#7349)
* Add test for parent blockStatement with use strict directive (#7349)
* Update tests (#7349)
* Update tests (#7349)
* Update tests (#7349)
* Add test for constructor-only class (#7349)
* Constructor only classes are strict, too
But constructor only that use non-simple parameters must use a strict function wrapper.
* Fix test
* Wrapper not needed if class is already strict
* Revert change to lerna.json
