ESLint added experimental support for typescript config files since
[9.9.0](https://eslint.org/blog/2024/08/eslint-v9.9.0-released/#experimental-typescript-configuration-files),
and as of
[9.18.0](https://eslint.org/blog/2025/01/eslint-v9.18.0-released/#stable-typescript-configuration-file-support)
that support is stable. This PR add ts/mts/cts to the list of known
eslint config files, and adds the same extensions to config file
generators
## Current Behavior
When using the eslint executor with a ts file, returns error "When using
the new Flat Config with ESLint, all configs must be named
eslint.config.js or eslint.config.cjs and .eslintrc files may not be
used. See
https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/configuration-files"
When using the eslint plugin, the inferred task is not created for
projects that do not have a non-ts eslint config.
### Workarounds
- Compiling ts rules/configs in a project. Introduces other issues
- Using jiti or comparable
- For plugin users, having a fake eslint.config.js at the root allows
the inferred task to be created. ESLint will still use the ts config.
- Cache targets are wrong
- Complications in non-monorepo workspaces
## Expected Behavior
When using the eslint executor with a ts file, no error is thrown.
When using the eslint plugin with a ts file, the inferred task is
created.
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
No issues, but addresses [this
discussion](https://github.com/nrwl/nx/discussions/29710#discussion-7856165)
---------
Co-authored-by: Leosvel Pérez Espinosa <leosvel.perez.espinosa@gmail.com>
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
---------
Co-authored-by: Colum Ferry <cferry09@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Cunningham <ndcunningham@gmail.com>
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
Currently, when we use generator's via the CLI passing the `name` arg
has more than one responsibility:
1. it can be used as a path
2. it can be used as the generator's name (e.g. Component name)
This is not intuitive as if we use via Nx Console because it creates
some ambiguity around the `--name` property which is normally described
as only 2.
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
What is expected is that the `name` property should only have the
responsibility of determining the name of the generated module
(Component, Directive etc...).
The new property `path` replaces the `directory` property but fulfils
the same purpose as determining where the module should be created.
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
---------
Co-authored-by: Jack Hsu <jack.hsu@gmail.com>
<!-- Please make sure you have read the submission guidelines before
posting an PR -->
<!--
https://github.com/nrwl/nx/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#-submitting-a-pr
-->
<!-- Please make sure that your commit message follows our format -->
<!-- Example: `fix(nx): must begin with lowercase` -->
<!-- If this is a particularly complex change or feature addition, you
can request a dedicated Nx release for this pull request branch. Mention
someone from the Nx team or the `@nrwl/nx-pipelines-reviewers` and they
will confirm if the PR warrants its own release for testing purposes,
and generate it for you if appropriate. -->
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
-->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is
merged. -->
Fixes #
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Cunningham <ndcunningham@gmail.com>
