## Current Behavior The `pnpm build:wasm` command fails with compilation errors due to missing dependencies and system-dependent features being included in WASM builds. ## Expected Behavior WASM builds should compile successfully by excluding features that require system access (IPC, terminals, file locking, etc.) while maintaining these features for native builds. ## Related Issue(s) Fixes WASM build compatibility issues ## Changes Made ### Core Changes - Added conditional compilation flags (`#[cfg(not(target_arch = "wasm32"))]`) to IDE console modules - Made `socket_path` module conditional for non-WASM targets only - Fixed unused import warnings for WASM builds in `file_lock.rs` and `walker.rs` ### Generated File Updates - Updated TypeScript definitions and JavaScript bindings to reflect conditional compilation - WASM builds now exclude system-dependent features like terminal UI and database connections ### Technical Details The IDE console functionality depends on: - `interprocess` crate for IPC communication - `jsonrpsee` crate for JSON-RPC messaging - Terminal and file system features not available in WASM These features are now properly isolated for native targets only while maintaining full functionality for standard Node.js builds. ## Testing - ✅ `pnpm build:wasm` now passes successfully - ✅ Generated bindings properly exclude WASM-incompatible features - ✅ Native builds retain all existing functionality
6.4 KiB
When responding to queries about this repository:
- Use the
nx_workspacemcp tool for understanding the workspace architecture when appropriate - When working in projects, use the
nx_projectmcp tool to analyze and understand the specific project structure and dependencies - Suggest relevant commands from the "Essential Commands" section when applicable
- Highlight Nx's focus on monorepos and its key features like smart task execution, code generation, and project graph analysis
- Mention the plugin ecosystem and support for various frameworks when relevant
- Emphasize the importance of running the full validation suite before committing changes
Always strive to provide accurate, helpful responses that align with the best practices and workflows described in this file.
GitHub Issue Response Mode
When responding to GitHub issues, determine your approach based on how the request is phrased:
Plan-First Mode (Default)
Use this approach when users ask you to:
- "analyze", "investigate", "assess", "review", "examine", or "plan"
- Or when the request is ambiguous
In this mode:
- Provide a detailed analysis of the issue
- Create a comprehensive implementation plan
- Break down the solution into clear steps
- Then please post the plan as a comment on the issue
Immediate Implementation Mode
Use this approach when users ask you to:
- "fix", "implement", "solve", "build", "create", "update", or "add"
- Or when they explicitly request immediate action
In this mode:
- Analyze the issue quickly
- Implement the complete solution immediately
- Make all necessary code changes. Please make multiple commits so that the changes are easier to review.
- Run appropriate tests and validation
- If the tests, are not passing, please fix the issues and continue doing this up to 3 more times until the tests pass
- Once the tests pass, push a branch and then suggest opening a PR which has a description of the changes made, and that it make sure that it explicitly says "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER" to automatically close the issue when the PR is merged.
Avoid making changes to generated files
Files under generated directories are generated based on a different source file and should not be modified directly.
Find the underlying source and modify that instead.
Essential Commands
Code Formatting
After code changes are made, please make sure to format the files with prettier via npx prettier -- FILE_NAME
Pre-push Validation
# Full validation suite - run before committing
nx prepush
If the prepush validation suite fails, please fix the issues before proceeding with your work. This ensures that all code adheres to the project's standards and passes all tests. DO NOT make a new commit to fix these issues. Instead, amend the current commit.
Testing Changes
After code changes are made, first test the specific project where the changes were made:
nx run-many -t test,build,lint -p PROJECT_NAME
After verifying the individual project, validate that the changes in projects which have been affected:
# Test only affected projects (recommended for development)
nx affected -t build,test,lint
As the last step, run the e2e tests to fully ensure that changes are valid:
# Run affected e2e tests (recommended for development)
nx affected -t e2e-local
Fixing GitHub Issues
When working on a GitHub issue, follow this systematic approach:
1. Get Issue Details
# Get issue details using GitHub CLI (replace ISSUE_NUMBER with actual number)
gh issue view ISSUE_NUMBER
# View multiple issues efficiently in one command
gh issue list --limit 50 --json number,title,state,labels,assignees,updatedAt,body --jq '.[] | select(.number == 123 or .number == 456 or .number == 789)'
# Or filter by specific criteria to get multiple related issues
gh issue list --label "bug" --state "open" --json number,title,body,labels --jq '.[]'
gh issue list --assignee "@me" --json number,title,body,state --jq '.[]'
Tip: Instead of running gh issue view multiple times, use gh issue list with JSON output and filtering to gather
information about multiple issues in a single command. This is much more efficient than viewing issues one at a time.
Always provide clickable links: When discussing GitHub issues or PRs, always include the full GitHub URL so the user can easily open them in their browser. For example:
- Issue #12345: https://github.com/nrwl/nx/issues/12345
- PR #67890: https://github.com/nrwl/nx/pull/67890
When cloning reproduction repos, please clone within ./tmp/claude/repro-ISSUE_NUMBER
2. Analyze the Plan
- Look for a plan or implementation details in the issue description
- Check comments for additional context or clarification
- Identify affected projects and components
3. Implement the Solution
- Follow the plan outlined in the issue
- Make focused changes that address the specific problem
- Ensure code follows existing patterns and conventions
4. Run Full Validation
Use the testing workflow from the "Essential Commands" section.
5. Submit Pull Request
- Create a descriptive PR title that references the issue
- Always fill in the PR template - don't leave it empty
- Include "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER" in the PR description
- Provide a clear summary of changes made
- Request appropriate reviewers
Pull Request Template
IMPORTANT: When creating a pull request, you MUST fill in the template found in .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.
Do not leave the template sections empty. The template includes:
Required Sections
- Current Behavior: Describe the behavior we have today
- Expected Behavior: Describe the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR
- Related Issue(s): Link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when the PR is merged
Template Format
## Current Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we have today -->
## Expected Behavior
<!-- This is the behavior we should expect with the changes in this PR -->
## Related Issue(s)
<!-- Please link the issue being fixed so it gets closed when this is merged. -->
Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER
Guidelines
- Ensure your commit message follows the conventional commit format (use
pnpm commit) - Read the submission guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md before posting
- For complex changes, you can request a dedicated Nx release by mentioning the Nx team
- Always link the related issue using "Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER" to automatically close it when merged